Preview

Medical Immunology (Russia)

Advanced search

Cytokine gene expression in bone marrow cell fractions isolated by counterflow centrifugal elutriation

https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-CGE-3211

Abstract

Cellular contents of red bone marrow is presented by an extremely heterogeneous cell population including stem cells, reticular cells, and differentiationg cells of five hematopoietic lineages. The current task for cell therapy and experimental studies is to obtain cell fractions of bone marrow enriched with a certain type of cells. In this paper we investigated the level of cytokine mRNA expression in bone marrow cell fractions isolated by counterflow centrifugation in an elutriator rotor. The marrow cell fractions were isolated at a rotor speed of 2500 rpm. Six cell fractions (F-1 to F-6) were collected: F-1, at a buffer flow rate of 12 mL/min; F-2, at 15 mL/min; F-3, at 19 mL/min; F-4, at 23 mL/min; F-5, at 50 mL/min. Fraction 6 was collected after stopping the rotation. Cytomorphological analysis of the fractions showed that erythrocytes (80%) and lymphocytes (40%) are collected in the “light” fraction F-1, lymphocytes (44%), polychromatophilic (50%) and oxyphilic (51%) normocytes – in F-2, neutrophils (70%) and eosinophilic granulocytes (40%) – in F-3 and F-4, macrophages (64%), megakaryocytes (95%), reticular (35%) and mast cells (62%) – in F-6. Blast cells of different hematopoietic lineages were detected mainly in F-5. Using RT-PCR, the maximum gene expression of the stem cell factor (Scf) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Gm-csf) was detected in the “heavy” fraction F-6, gene expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (Tnfα) and erythropoietin (Epo) – in F-4, F-5 and F-6, and gene expression of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-csf) – in F-3 and F-4. Thus, this method allows to separate the “light” fractions of lymphocytes and erythrocytes from the bulk of bone marrow cells, which can be used in allogeneic bone marrow cell transplantation to reduce the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease. Another important advantage of the method is the ability to obtain fractions of “heavy” cells with high regenerative potential in order to use them in cell therapy in order to stimulate regenerative processes in organs and tissues.

About the Authors

A. N. Dudarev
Research Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine
Russian Federation

PhD (Biology), Senior Researcher, Laboratoty of Mechanisms of Intercellular Communication, Research Institute of Biochemistry.

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

none



T. A. Nepsha
Research Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine
Russian Federation

Researcher, Laboratoty of Mechanisms of Intercellular Communication, Research Institute of Biochemistry.

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

none



A. Yu. Gorodetskaya
Research Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine
Russian Federation

Researcher, Laboratoty of Mechanisms of Intercellular Communication, Research Institute of Biochemistry.

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

none



I. F. Usynin
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ivan-Usynin
Research Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine
Russian Federation

PhD, MD (Biology), Head, Laboratoty of Mechanisms of Intercellular Communication, Research Institute of Biochemistry.

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

none



References

1. Vladimirsky E.B. Normal hematopoiesis and its regulation. Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya = Clinical Oncohematology, 2015, Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 109-119. (In Russ.)

2. Goldberg E.D., Dygai A.M., Shakhov V.P. Methods of tissue culture in hematology. Tomsk: Tomsk State University, 1992. 272 p.

3. Kladova I.V., Kivva V.N., Khripoun A.V., Сhernikova I.V., Strahova N.B., Antipova N.V., Beloborodovа T.P., Vorobyov I.Yu. Neuroprotective effects of erythropoietin: opportunities, prospects and reality (review). Meditsinskiy vestnik yuga Rossii = Medical Herald of the South of Russia, 2014, no. 3, pp. 28-35. (In Russ.)

4. Maslov L.N., Sazonova S.I. Using cytokines to stimulate neoangiogenesis and cardiac regeneration. Eksperimentalnaya i klinicheskaya farmakologiya = Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, 2006, no. 5, pp. 70-76. (In Russ.)

5. Bolliger А.P. Cytologic evaluation of bone marrow in rats: indications, methods, and normal morphology. Vet. Clin. Pathol., 2004, Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 58-67.

6. Braza M.S., Conde P., Garcia M., Cortegano I., Brahmachary M., Pothula V.F., Fay F., Boros P., Werner S.A., Ginhoux F., Mulder W.J.M., Ochando J. Neutrophil derived CSF1 induces macrophage polarization and promotes transplantation tolerance. Am. J. Transplant., 2018, Vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1247-1255.

7. Centrifugal elutriation. In: Burdon R.H., van Knippenberg P.H., Sharpe P.T. (eds.). Methods of cell separation. Laboratory techniques in biochemistry and molecular biology. Elsevier, 1988, pp. 91-106.

8. Chakraborty P., Wang Y., Wei J.H., van Deursen J., Yu H., Malureanu L., Dasso M., Forbes D.J., Levy D.E., Seemann J., Fontoura B.M.A. Nucleoporin levels regulate cell cycle progression and phase-specific gene expression. Dev. Cell, 2008, Vol. 15, pp. 657-667.

9. de Witte T., Plas A., Koekman E., Blankenborg G., Salden M., Wessels J., Haanen C. Separation of human bone marrow by counterflow centrifugation monitored by DNA-flowcytometry. Br. J. Haematol., 1984, Vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 249-258.

10. de Witte T., Hoogenhout J., de Pauw B., Holdrinet R., Janssen J., Wessels J., van Daal W., Hustinx T., Haanen C. Depletion of donor lymphocytes by counterflow centrifugation successfully prevents acute graft-versushost disease in matched allogeneic marrow transplantation. Blood, 1986, Vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1302-1308.

11. Gengozian N., Legendre A.M. Separation of feline bone marrow cells by counterflow centrifugal elutriation. Identification and isolation of presumptive early and late myeloid/erythroid progenitors. Transplantation, 1995, Vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 836-841.

12. Goldenberg-Cohen N., Iskovich S., Askenasy N. Bone marrow homing enriches stem cells responsible for neogenesis of insulin-producing cells, while radiation decreases homing efficiency. Stem Cells Dev., 2015, Vol. 24, no. 19, pp. 2297-2306.

13. Khansari N., Beauclair K., Gustad T. Separation of bovine lymphocytes and granulocytes from blood by use of elutriation. Am. J. Vet. Res., 1989, Vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1263-1265.

14. Lindahl P.E. Principle of a counter-streaming centrifuge for the separation of particles of different sizes. Nature, 1948, Vol. 161, pp. 648-650.

15. Michalopoulos G.K. Principles of liver regeneration and growth homeostasis. Compr. Physiol., 2013, Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 485-513.

16. Orlic D., Kajstura J., Chimenti S., Limana F., Jakoniuk I., Quaini F., Nadal-Ginard B., Bodine D.M., Leri A., Anversa P. Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2001, Vol. 98, no. 18, pp. 10344-10349.

17. Schirrmacher, V. Bone Marrow: The Central Immune System. Immuno, 2023, Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 289-329.

18. Stroncek D.F., Fellowes V., Pham C., Khuu H., Fowler D.H., Wood L.V., Sabatino M. Counter-flow elutriation of clinical peripheral blood mononuclear cell concentrates for the production of dendritic and T cell therapies. J. Transl. Med., 2014, Vol. 12, 241. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0241-y.

19. Usynin I., Frevert U., Klotz C. Malaria circumsporozoite protein inhibits respiratory burst in Kupffer cells. Cell Microbiol., 2007, Vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 2610-2628.

20. Zahorchak A.F., DeRiggi M.L., Muzzio J.L., Sutherland V., Humar A., Lakkis F.G., Hsu Y.S., Thomson A.W. Manufacturing and validation of Good Manufacturing Practice-compliant regulatory dendritic cells for infusion into organ transplant recipients. Cytotherapy, 2023, Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 432-441.


Review

For citations:


Dudarev A.N., Nepsha T.A., Gorodetskaya A.Yu., Usynin I.F. Cytokine gene expression in bone marrow cell fractions isolated by counterflow centrifugal elutriation. Medical Immunology (Russia). 2026;28(1):109-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-CGE-3211

Views: 747

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1563-0625 (Print)
ISSN 2313-741X (Online)