MACROPHAGE AND MAST CELL DERIVED CHEMOKINE (CXCL8, CCL5, CXCL1 AND CCL2) RATIOS IN PERI-IMPLANTITIS: AS INDICATORS OF IMMUNE DYSREGULATION
https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-MAM-3444
Аннотация
Background: Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory condition that damages the tissues surrounding dental implants. It develops when the body's immune response to bacterial biofilm and implant-related factors becomes dysregulated. Key signaling proteins called chemokines as CXCL8, CXCL1, CCL5 and CCL2orchestrate the recruitment of immune cells like neutrophils and macrophages. Shifts in the balance between these chemokines may reflect an underlying immune disturbance around implants.
Aim: This study aimed to measure and compare the levels of CXCL8, CXCL1, CCL5, and CCL2 and their relative ratios in the peri-implant sulcular fluid of three groups: individuals with healthy implants, patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis, and a control group with no implants.
Materials and Methods: In a case-control study, a total of 80 participants were divided into three groups: healthy controls without implants (n=30), patients with healthy osseointegrated implants (n=30), and patients with peri-implantitis (n=20). We recorded demographic data and clinical parameters including probing depth (PD) and plaque index. PISF samples were collected using PerioPaper strips and stored at -80°C until analysis. Chemokine concentrations were determined using ELISA.
Results: Probing depth and plaque index were significantly higher in the peri-implantitis group compared to the healthy implant and control groups (p<0.005). All four chemokines were elevated in peri-implantitis compared to both healthy groups: CXCL8 (773.9 ± 112.7 pg/mL), CXCL1 (327.1 ± 188.4 pg/mL), CCL5 (243.5 ± 48.8 pg/mL), and CCL2 (729.3 ± 86.9 pg/mL) (p<0.005). The ratios between chemokines revealed distinct patterns: (CXCL8/CCL5) was highest in healthy implants, (CXCL1/CCL2) increased progressively from controls to peri-implantitis, (CXCL8/CXCL1) declined across groups, and (CCL5/CCL2) dropped in healthy implants before rising slightly in peri-implantitis (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Peri-implantitis is associated with deeper pockets, more plaque and higher levels of neutrophil and macrophage related chemokines. Importantly, composite ratios (CXCL8/CCL5) and (CXCL1/CCL2) distinguished between health and disease more clearly than individual chemokine levels alone pointing to a shift in immune signaling. These ratios could potentially serve as useful biomarkers for early identification and tracking of peri-implant inflammation.
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
E. TalibИрак
Конфликт интересов:
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
A. Najm
Ирак
Конфликт интересов:
None
Gh. Taha
Ирак
Конфликт интересов:
None
Список литературы
1. Albrektsson, T., & Sennerby, L. (1991). State of the art in oral implants. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 18(6), 474–481.
2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x
3. Aleksandrowicz, P., Brzezińska-Błaszczyk, E., Kozłowska, E., Żelechowska, P., Borgonovo, A. E., & Agier, J. (2021). Analysis of IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α levels in the crevicular fluid of patients with periodontitis or healthy implants. BMC Oral Health, 21(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01478-3
4. Barczak, K., Droździk, A., Bosiacki, M., Łagocka, R., Cenariu, D., Uriciuc, W. A., & Baranowska-Bosiacka, I. (2023). CCL5’s Role in Periodontal Disease: A Narrative Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(24), 17332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417332
5. Berglundh, T., Armitage, G., Araujo, M. G., Avila‐Ortiz, G., Blanco, J., Camargo, P. M., Chen, S., Cochran, D., Derks, J., Figuero, E., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Heitz‐Mayfield, L. J. A., Huynh‐Ba, G., Iacono, V., Koo, K., Lambert, F., McCauley, L., Quirynen, M., Renvert, S., … Zitzmann, N. (2018). Peri‐implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri‐Implant Diseases and Conditions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(S20). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12957
6. Bertoldo, B. B., Paulo, G. O., Furtado, T. C. de S., Pereira, T. L., Rodrigues, V., Rodrigues, D. B. R., de Faria, J. B., Rosa, R. C., & Pereira, S. A. de L. (2024a). New immunological aspects of peri-implantitis. Einstein (São Paulo), 22. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0396
7. Carcuac, O., & Berglundh, T. (2014). Composition of Human Peri-implantitis and Periodontitis Lesions. Journal of Dental Research, 93(11), 1083–1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514551754
8. Chmielewski, M., & Pilloni, A. (2023). Current Molecular, Cellular and Genetic Aspects of Peri-Implantitis Disease: A Narrative Review. Dentistry Journal, 11(5), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11050134
9. Huang, M., Wang, C., Li, P., Lu, H., Li, A., & Xu, S. (2024). Role of immune dysregulation in peri-implantitis. Frontiers in Immunology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1466417
10. Kormas, I., Pedercini, C., Pedercini, A., Raptopoulos, M., Alassy, H., & Wolff, L. F. (2020). Peri-Implant Diseases: Diagnosis, Clinical, Histological, Microbiological Characteristics and Treatment Strategies. A Narrative Review. Antibiotics, 9(11), 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110835
11. Lindhe, J., & Meyle, J. (2008). Peri‐implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 35(s8), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01283.x
12. Lumbikananda, S., Srithanyarat, S. S., Mattheos, N., & Osathanon, T. (2024). Oral Fluid Biomarkers for Peri-Implantitis: A Scoping Review. International Dental Journal, 74(3), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2023.11.005
13. Murphy, P. M., Baggiolini, M., Charo, I. F., Hébert, C. A., Horuk, R., Matsushima, K., Miller, L. H., Oppenheim, J. J., & Power, C. A. (2000). International Union of Pharmacology. XXII. Nomenclature for Chemokine Receptors. Pharmacological Reviews, 52(1), 145–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-6997(24)01439-X
14. Park, S., Park, K., Kim, E., Kim, C. Y., Hwang, S., Lee, J., Suh, J., Lee, Y., Kim, M. O., & Kim, Y. (2024). <scp>CXCL5</scp> / <scp>CXCL8</scp> induces neutrophilic inflammation in peri‐implantitis. Journal of Periodontal Research, 59(4), 698–711.
15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13230
16. Rath-Deschner, B., Memmert, S., Damanaki, A., Nokhbehsaim, M., Eick, S., Cirelli, J. A., Götz, W., Deschner, J., Jäger, A., & Nogueira, A. V. B. (2020). CXCL1, CCL2, and CCL5 modulation by microbial and biomechanical signals in periodontal cells and tissues—in vitro and in vivo studies. Clinical Oral Investigations, 24(10), 3661–3670. -1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03244
17. Renvert, S., Persson, G. R., Pirih, F. Q., & Camargo, P. M. (2018). Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: Case definitions and diagnostic considerations. Journal of clinical periodontology, 45 Suppl 20, S278–S285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12956
18. Sanz, M., & Chapple, I. L. (2012). Clinical research on peri‐implant diseases: consensus report of <scp>W</scp> orking <scp>G</scp> roup 4. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 39(s12), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01837.x
19. TAHA, G. I. (2024). Involvement of IL-10 gene polymorphism (rs1800896) and IL-10 level in the development of periimplantitis. Minerva Dental and Oral Science, 73(5), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04844-1
20. Talib, E. Q., & Taha, G. I. (2024). Involvement of interlukin-17A (IL-17A) gene polymorphism and interlukin-23 (IL-23) level in the development of peri-implantitis. BDJ Open, 10(1), 12. 9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00193-
21. Winnen, R. G., Kniha, K., Modabber, A., Al-Sibai, F., Braun, A., Kneer, R., & Hölzle, F. (2021). Reversal of Osseointegration as a Novel Perspective for the Removal of Failed Dental Implants: A Review of Five Patented Methods. Materials, 14(24), 7829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247829
22. Xanthopoulou, V., Räisänen, I. T., Sorsa, T., Tortopidis, D., & Sakellari, D. (2024). Diagnostic value of aMMP‐8 and azurocidin in peri‐implant sulcular fluid as biomarkers of peri‐implant health or disease. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.883
23. Yuan, S., Wei, Y., Jiang, W., Sun, F., Li, S., Li, Q., Song, Z., Liu, Z., Mo, Y., Wang, X., Li, N., Lv, P., She, S., Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Hu, W. (2024). <scp>CCR2</scp> is a potential therapeutic target in peri‐implantitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 51(3), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13916
24. Zlotnik, A., & Yoshie, O. (2000). Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity, 12(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80165-x https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-015-0189-2
Дополнительные файлы
|
1. 3444 | |
| Тема | ||
| Тип | Прочее | |
Скачать
(127KB)
|
Метаданные ▾ | |
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
, , . Медицинская иммунология. https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-MAM-3444
For citation:
Talib E.Q., Najm A.Z., Taha G.I. MACROPHAGE AND MAST CELL DERIVED CHEMOKINE (CXCL8, CCL5, CXCL1 AND CCL2) RATIOS IN PERI-IMPLANTITIS: AS INDICATORS OF IMMUNE DYSREGULATION. Medical Immunology (Russia). https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-MAM-3444
JATS XML





































