Preview

Medical Immunology (Russia)

Advanced search

Cytokine production by the bioptates of invasive non-specific breast carcinoma as a criterion for the use of acetylamide form of synthetic HLDF-6 peptide for differentiation therapy of breast cancer

https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-CPB-3147

Abstract

Differentiation therapy is a promising direction in treatment of oncological diseases. It is based on usage of agents that increase the degree of tumour cell differentiation, and thereby reduce the malignant potential of the neoplasm. Such effects are shown for the acetyl-amide form of the synthetic peptide HLDF-6. The peptide was previously found to reduce the relative content of low-differentiated cells in breast cancer biopsy specimens. However, the mechanisms of the peptide's effect on tumour cells and its microenvironment remain unknown. The effect of this peptide may be associated with altered functional activity of the tumour. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of acetyl-amide form of synthetic HLDF-6 peptide on cytokine production by bioptates of invasive non-specific breast carcinoma. Morphometric analysis of bioptates obtained from 40 women with invasive breast carcinoma of nonspecific type before and after exposure to acetyl-amide form of synthetic peptide HLDF-6 was performed. To evaluate the effect of this peptide, we proposed an estimated index for HLDF-6 effect being expressed in conventional units (c. u.). The index of HLDF-6 influence of 0.9 с. u. and less is accepted as a significant effect. Depending on the index value, the patients were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 27 patients with a significant effect of the studied peptide, the second group consisted of 13 patients without a significant effect. Concentrations of TNFa, IFNg, VEGF, G-CSF, GM-CSF, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-1b were determined in parallel in supernatants of bioptates before and after incubation with the studied peptide using the enzyme immunoassay technique. The influence (effect) index, IE-HLDF-6-cytokine, expressed in conventional units (c. u.), reflected the effect of the acetyl-amide form of the synthetic HLDF-6 peptide on cytokine production by tumour bioptates. The study showed that spontaneous production of GM-CSF in the first group was significantly lower than in the second group. However, the concentration of this cytokine under the influence of HLDF-6 peptide significantly increases in group I in comparison with group II, as evidenced by statistically significant difference in IEHLDF-6-cytokine. According to the results of ROC-analysis, a good model quality was obtained in the study of IE-HLDF-6-GM-CSF and relative content of low-differentiated cells, which may serve as a basis for using this index as a cut-off point used for selection of patients who may be candidates for differentiation therapy with acetyl-amide form of synthetic peptide HLDF-6.

About the Authors

E. D. Mangazeeva
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics of Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine
Russian Federation

Mangazeeva Ekaterina D., Junior Researcher, Central Research Laboratory, Novosibirsk State Medical University; Junior Researcher, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics of Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine

Novosibirsk



A. A. Studenikina
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics of Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine
Russian Federation

Studenikina Anastasia A., PhD (Medicine), Senior Researcher, Central Research Laboratory, Novosibirsk State Medical University; Researcher, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics of Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine

Novosibirsk



E. S. Michailova
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics of Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine
Russian Federation

Mikhailova Elena S., Researcher, Central Research Laboratory, Novosibirsk State Medical University; Senior Researcher, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics of Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine

Novosibirsk



D. V. Morozov
City Clinical Hospital No. 1
Russian Federation

Morozov Dmitry V., PhD (Medicine), Head, Pathoanatomical Department

Novosibirsk



S. L. Ryzhikova
JSC Vector-Best
Russian Federation

Ryzhikova Svetlana L., Head, Cytokine Laboratory

Novosibirsk



Yu. G. Druzhinina
JSC Vector-Best
Russian Federation

Druzhinina Yulia G., Leading Biotechnologist, Cytokine Laboratory

Novosibirsk



A. V. Proskura
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics of Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine
Russian Federation

Proskura Andrey V., Researcher

Novosibirsk



A. P. Bogachuk
Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Bogachuk Anna P., PhD (Сhemistry), Research Engineer, Laboratory of Hormonal Regulation Proteins

Moscow



V. M. Lipkin
Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Lipkin Valery M., PhD, MD (Сhemistry), Professor, Corresponding Member, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Hormonal Regulation Proteins

Moscow



A. I. Autenshlyus
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics of Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine
Russian Federation

Autenshlyus Alexander I., PhD, MD (Biology), Professor, Head, Central Research Laboratory, Novosibirsk State Medical University; Chief Researcher, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics of Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine

Novosibirsk



References

1. Autenshlus A.I., Zhurakovsky I.P., Marinkin I.O., Bogachuk A.P., Lipkin V.M. A remedy that reduces the relative content of low-differentiated and increases the relative content of highly differentiated cells in invasive breast carcinoma of a non-specific type. Patent No. 2786528 C1, 21.12.2022.

2. Paukov V.S. Clinical pathology. Moscow: Littera, 2018. 768 p.

3. Pospekhova N.I., Golovina D.A., Filippova M.G., Semyanikhina A.V., Dranko S.L., Danishevich A.M., Stroganova A.M. Molecular biological subtypes of breast cancer in brca1 mutation carriers. Uspekhi sovremennoy biologii = Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2020, Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 29-36. (In Russ.)

4. Becher B., Tugues S., Greter M. GM-CSF: From growth factor to central mediator of tissue inflammation. Immunity, 2016, Vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 963-973.

5. Cruceriu D., Baldasici O., Balacescu O., Berindan-Neagoe I. The dual role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in breast cancer: molecular insights and therapeutic approaches. Cell. Oncol. (Dordr.), 2020, Vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1-18.

6. Erez N., Glanz S., Raz Y., Avivi C., Barshack I. Cancer Associated Fibroblasts express pro-inflammatory factors in human breast and ovarian tumors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2013, Vol. 437, no. 3, pp. 397-402.

7. Erić I., Petek Erić A., Kristek J., Koprivčić I., Babić M. Breast cancer in young women: pathologic and immunohistochemical features. Acta Clin. Croat., 2018, Vol. 57, no. 3, pp, 497-502.

8. Fotinós J., Barberis L., Condat C.A. Effects of a differentiating therapy on cancer-stem-cell-driven tumors. J. Theor. Biol., 2023, Vol. 572, 111563. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111563.

9. Habanjar O., Bingula R., Decombat C., Diab-Assaf M., Caldefie-Chezet F., Delort L. Crosstalk of inflammatory cytokines within the breast tumor microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2023, Vol. 24, no. 4, 4002. doi: 10.3390/ijms24044002.

10. Howard F.M., Olopade O.I. Epidemiology of triple-negative breast cancer: a review. Cancer J., 2021, Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 8-16.

11. Kumar A., Taghi Khani A., Sanchez Ortiz A., Swaminathan S. GM-CSF: A double-edged sword in cancer immunotherapy. Front. Immunol., 2022, Vol. 13, 901277. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.901277.

12. Li J., Chen Z., Su K., Zeng J. Clinicopathological classification and traditional prognostic indicators of breast cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol., 2015, Vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 8500-8505.

13. Mihalik N.E., Steinberger K.J., Stevens A.M., Bobko A.A., Hoblitzell E.H., Tseytlin O., Akhter H., Dziadowicz S.A., Wang L., O’Connell R.C., Monaghan K.L., Hu G., Mo X., Khramtsov V.V., Tseytlin M., Driesschaert B., Wan E.C.K., Eubank T.D. Dose-specific intratumoral GM-CSF modulates breast tumor oxygenation and antitumor immunity. J. Immunol., 2023, Vol. 211, no. 10, pp. 1589-1604.

14. Rakha E.A., Reis-Filho J.S., Baehner F., Dabbs D.J., Decker T., Eusebi V., Fox S.B., Ichihara S., Jacquemier J., Lakhani S.R., Palacios J., Richardson A.L., Schnitt S.J., Schmitt F.C., Tan P.H., Tse G.M., Badve S., Ellis I.O. Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res., 2010, Vol. 12, no. 4, 207. doi: 10.1186/bcr2607.

15. Turner K.M., Yeo S.K., Holm T.M., Shaughnessy E., Guan J.L. Heterogeneity within molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol., 2021, Vol. 321, no. 2, pp. 343-354.

16. Yang Z., Zeng H., Li J., Zeng N., Zhang Q., Hou K., Li J., Yu J., Wu Y. Dissecting the emerging role of cancerassociated adipocyte-derived cytokines in remodeling breast cancer progression. Heliyon, 2024, Vol. 10, no.15, e35200. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35200.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Mangazeeva E.D., Studenikina A.A., Michailova E.S., Morozov D.V., Ryzhikova S.L., Druzhinina Yu.G., Proskura A.V., Bogachuk A.P., Lipkin V.M., Autenshlyus A.I. Cytokine production by the bioptates of invasive non-specific breast carcinoma as a criterion for the use of acetylamide form of synthetic HLDF-6 peptide for differentiation therapy of breast cancer. Medical Immunology (Russia). 2025;27(4):739-748. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-CPB-3147

Views: 296


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1563-0625 (Print)
ISSN 2313-741X (Online)