EOSINOPHILIC CATIONIC PROTEIN AS A MARKER OF ALLERGIC INFLAMMATION OF NASAL MUCOSA

Abstract. Eosinophils are regarded as major cell population directly involved into late phase of allergic inflammation of nasal mucosa. We performed a comparative study, measuring the amounts of eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) in nasal secretions and serum samples of thirty-three patients with persistent allergic rhinitis (PAR), and twenty-five persons with chronic infectious rhinitis (CIR), to determine diagnostic significance of these parameters. Eosinophil counts in nasal secret were carried out by exfoliative cytology analysis. Sampling of nasal secretions was performed by absorption method. The samples were standardized by concentration of urea in nasal secretions and sera. ЕСР levels in nasal secretions and serum were determined by chemiluminescence assays (UniCAP 100, Phadia, Sweden). Mean scores of eosinophils in nasal secret of PAR patients were 4.6 times higher, than in the patients with CIR. Median ECP values in serum and nasal secretions of PAR patients were, resp., 30.5±28.0 μg/l and 402.7±326.9 μg/l. In patients with CIR, ECP values were 12.4±11.5 μg/l in serum and 86.9±137.4 μg/l in nasal secretions. The appropriate differences have been significant (р < 0.05). No correlations were found between ECP levels in serum and nasal secretions, as well as between ECP levels and eosinophil counts in nasal secretions. The technique of ECP determination in nasal secretions was the most sensitive approach, whereas counting of eosinophils proved to be the most specific method. ECP levels in nasal secretions well characterize an active phase of allergic inflammation and may be used as quantitative parameter for estimation of PAR severity.

1. Хмельницкая Н.М., Рязанцев С.В., Клячко Л.Л. и др. Методы изучения и исследования экзокринных секретов для изучения некоторых параметров местного иммунитета // Клинич. лаб. диагностика. – 1997. – № 12. – С. 43-44.

2. Balfor-Linn I. Quantitative evaluation of nasal mucosa proteins // Clin. Exp. Allergy. – 1999. – Vol. 29, N 5. – P. 719-720.

3. Bernardini R., Novembre E., Mugnaini L., Rossi M.E., Vierucci A. Eosinophil cationic protein and tryptase in the nasal lavage fluid of children with grass-pollen rhinitis: levocabastine effect // Allergy Asthma Proc. – 1998. – Vol. 19, N 2. – P. 75-80.

4. Bousquet J., Vignola A.M., Campbell A.M., Michel F.B. Pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis // Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. – 1996. – Vol. 110. – P. 207-218.

5. Durham S.R. Mechanisms of mucosal inflammation in the nose and lungs // Clin. Exp. Allergy. – 1998. – Vol. 28, N 2. – P. 11-16.

6. Frischer T., Baraldi E. Upper airway sampling // Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. – 2000. – Vol. 162, N 2. – P. 28-30.

7. Frischer T., Halmerbauer G., Gartner C., Rath R., Tauber E., Schierl M., Koller D.Y., Urbanek R., Forster J., Kuhr J. Eosinophil-derived proteins in nasal lavage fluid of neonates of allergic patients and the development of respiratory symptoms during the first 6 months of life // Allergy. – 2000. – Vol. 55, N 8. – P. 773-777.

8. Garrelds I., De Graaf-in‘t Veld T., Nahori M., Vargaftig B.B., Gerth van Wijk R., Zijlstra F.J. Interleukin-5 and eosinophil cationic protein in nasal lavages of rhinitis patients // Eur. J. Pharmacol. – 1995. – Vol. 275, N 3. – P. 295-300.

9. Jankowski R., Persoons M., Foliguet B., Coffinet L., Thomas C., Verient-Montaut B. Eosinophil count in nasal secretions with and without nasal symptoms // Rhinology. – 2000. – Vol. 38, N 1. – P. 23-32.

10. Jean R., Delakourt C., Rufin P., Pfister A., Waernessyckle S., de Blic J., Scheinmann P. Nasal cytology in rhinitis children: comparison between brushing and blowing the nose // Allergy. – 1997. – Vol. 51, N 12. – P. 932-934.

11. Juniper E.F., Guyatt G.H., Dolvich J. Assessment of quality of life in adolescents with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: development and testing of a questionnaire for clinical trials // J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. – 1994. – Vol. 93. – P. 413-423.

12. Klimek L., Rasp G. Norm values for eosinophil cationic protein in nasal secretions: influence of specimen collection // Clin. Exp. Allergy. – 1999. – Vol. 29, N 3. – P. 367-374.

13. Lee H.S., Majima Y., Sakakura Y., Shinogi J., Kawaguchi S., Kim B.W. Quantitative cytology of nasal secretions under various conditions // Laryngoscope. – 1993. – Vol. 103, N 5. – P. 533-537.

14. Lonnkvist K., Moshfegh A., Pedroletti C., Hedlin G., Hallden G., Lundahl J. Increased eosinophil trasmigration after nasal allergen challenge in children with allergic asthma and rhinitis // Allergy. – 2002. – Vol. 57. – P. 1200-1204.

15. Marccuci F., Sensi L.G., Migali E., Coniglio G. Eosinophil cationic protein and specific IgE in serum and nasal mucosa of patients with grass-pollen allergic rhinitis and asthma // Allergy. – 2001. – Vol. 56, N 3. – P. 231-236.

16. Rasp G., Thomas P., Bujia J. Eosinophil inflammation of the nasal mucosa in allergic and nonallergic rhinitis measured by eosinophil cationic protein levels in native nasal fluid and serum // Clin. Exp. Allergy. – 1994. – Vol. 24, N 12. – P. 1151-1156.

17. Shinogi J., Majima Y., Takeuchi K., Harada T., Sakakura Y. Quantitative cytology of nasal secretions with perennial allergic rhinitis in children: comparison of infected and noninfected conditions // Laryngoscope. – 1998. – Vol. 108, N 5. – P. 703-705.

18. Togias A.G. Systemic immunologic and inflammatory aspects of allergic rhinitis // J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. – 2000. – Vol. 106. – P. 247-250.

19. Wang D., Clement P., Smitz J., de Waele M., Derde M.P. Monitoring nasal allergic inflammation by measuring the concentration of eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophils in nasal secretions // Allergy. – 1995. – Vol. 50, N 2. – P. 147-151.

20. Wang D., Yeoh K. The significance and technical aspects of quantitative measurements of inflammatory mediators in allergic rhinitis // Asian. Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. – 1999. – Vol. 17, N 3. – P. 219-228.

21. Wilson S.J., Lau L., Howarth P.H. Inflammatory mediators in naturally occurring rhinitis // Clin. Exp. Allergy. – 1998. – Vol. 28. – P. 220-227.