Preview

Medical Immunology (Russia)

Advanced search

IMMUNOLOGICAL FEATURES OF SEPSIS PHENOTYPES AND ENDOTYPES

https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-IFO-3254

Abstract

Abstract

Sepsis is a heterogeneous and life-threatening condition caused by a dysregulated immune response to infection. The most severe form of sepsis is septic shock, characterized by arterial hypotension, impaired tissue perfusion, and hypoxia. Despite new findings in antimicrobial and intensive care therapy, the incidence and mortality rates of sepsis remain high, which underscores the relevance of further investigation of its pathogenesis. In recent years, research has shifted from clinical signs to the analysis of immunological and molecular mechanisms, which has led to the identification of  specific phenotypes and endotypes of the disease. Sepsis phenotypes are based on clinical manifestations and biomarkers, while endotypes are defined by molecular mechanisms, including immune gene expression patterns.

This article reviews key aspects of the innate and adaptive immune responses in sepsis, including the activation of proinflammatory cytokines, the development of coagulopathies, and disruptions of endothelial integrity and microvascular regulation.Moreover, the importance of mechanisms such as hyperinflammation, the simultaneous development of immunosuppression and functional exhaustion of immunocompetent cells is emphasized. Thus, immunological biomarkers are considered as a promising tool for patient‘s stratification, prognosis prediction and personalized therapy. Current immunodiagnostic methods are also considered in this article, including quantitative analysis of cytokine levels and assessment of innate immune dysfunction markers.

Thus, the current understanding of sepsis as an immunologically heterogeneous syndrome enables researchers to expand existing concepts of its pathogenesis. In contrast to the classical concept which is based on a shift from inflammation to immunosuppression, increasing data highlights the simultaneous presence of both processes in the same patient, making it necessary to reconsider existing diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

About the Authors

Mariia B. Potapova
I.I. Mechnikov Research Institute for Vaccines and Sera
Russian Federation

PhD, Researcher, Laboratory of Molecular Immunology


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest.



Vitaly V. Zverev
I.I. Mechnikov Research Institute for Vaccines and Sera; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Full Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD (Biology), PhD, Prof.


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest.



Maxim A. Babaev
B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center for Surgery
Russian Federation

MD, PhD


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest.



Ekaterina A. Bogdanova
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

PhD, associate professor


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest.



Oksana O. Grin
B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center for Surgery
Russian Federation

PhD


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest.



Irina B. Semenova
I.I. Mechnikov Research Institute for Vaccines and Sera
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, Leading Researcher


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest.



Ekaterina A. Meremianina
I.I. Mechnikov Research Institute for Vaccines and Sera
Russian Federation

PhD, Researcher, Laboratory of Molecular Immunology


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest.



Oxana A. Svitich
I.I. Mechnikov Research Institute for Vaccines and Sera; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Full Members of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, PhD, Prof.


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest.



References

1. Zurochka A.V., Kotlyarov A.N., Kuvaytsev M.V., Kvyatkovskaya S.V., Zurochka V.A., Ryabova L.V., Khaidukov S.V. HLA-DR antigen expression changes in monocytes in children and its clinical significance in sepsis. Medical Immunology, 2008, Vol. 10, No. 4–5, pp. 379–388.

2. Shcherbak S., Vologzhanin D., Golota A., Kamilova T., Sarana A., Makarenko S. Immunology of sepsis. University Therapeutic Bulletin, 2024, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 18–39.

3. Shcherbak S.G., Sarana A.M., Vologzhanin D.A., Golota A.S., Rud A.A., Kamilova T.A. Biomarkers of surgical sepsis: review of foreign scientific and medical publications. Clinical Practice, 2023, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 66–78.

4. Arora J., Mendelson A.A., Fox-Robichaud A. Sepsis: network pathophysiology and implications for early diagnosis. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., 2023, Vol. 324, No. 5, pp. R613-R624.

5. Chen Y., Guo D.Z., Zhu C.L., et al. The implication of targeting PD-1:PD-L1 pathway in treating sepsis through immunostimulatory and anti-inflammatory pathways. Front. Immunol., 2023, Vol. 14, 1323797.

6. Chenoweth J.G., Brandsma J., Striegel D.A., et al. Sepsis endotypes identified by host gene expression across global cohorts. Commun. Med., 2024, Vol. 4, No. 1, 120.

7. Cui J., Cai W., Lin J., et al. Monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells as an immune indicator of early diagnosis and prognosis in patients with sepsis. BMC Infect Dis., 2024, Vol. 24, No. 1, 399.

8. de Nooijer A. H., Kotsaki A., Kranidioti E., et al. Complement activation in severely ill patients with sepsis: no relationship with inflammation and disease severity. Crit. Care, 2023, Vol. 27, No. 1, 63.

9. de Nooijer A.H., Grondman I., Lambden S., et al. Increased sTREM-1 plasma concentrations are associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Biosci. Rep., 2021, Vol. 41, No. 7, BSR20210940.

10. Doganyigit Z., Eroglu E., Akyuz E. Inflammatory mediators of cytokines and chemokines in sepsis: From bench to bedside. Hum Exp Toxicol., 2022, Vol. 41

11. Doni A., Stravalaci M., Inforzato A., et al. The Long Pentraxin PTX3 as a Link Between Innate Immunity, Tissue Remodeling, and Cancer. Front. Immunol., 2019, Vol. 10, 712.

12. Gatica S., Fuentes B., Rivera-Asín E., et al. Novel evidence on sepsis-inducing pathogens: from laboratory to bedside. Front. Microbiol., 2023, Vol. 14, 1198200.

13. Gouel-Chéron A., Allaouchiche B., Guignant C., et al. Early interleukin-6 and slope of monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR: a powerful association to predict the development of sepsis after major trauma. PLoS One, 2012, Vol. 7, No. 3, e33095.

14. Hagman J., Lukin K. Plasma cells for hire: prior experience required. Immunity, 2013, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 89-91.

15. He X., Han B., Liu M. Long pentraxin 3 in pulmonary infection and acute lung injury. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol., 2007, Vol. 292, No. 5, pp. L1039-L1049.

16. Hotchkiss R.S., Monneret G., Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2013, Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 862-874.

17. Jacob S., Jacob S.A., Thoppil J. Targeting sepsis through inflammation and oxidative metabolism. World J. Crit. Care Med., 2025, Vol. 14, No. 1, 101499.

18. Jensen I.J., Sjaastad F.V., Griffith T.S., Badovinac V.P. Sepsis-Induced T Cell Immunoparalysis: The Ins and Outs of Impaired T Cell Immunity. J. Immunol., 2018, Vol. 200, No. 5, pp. 1543-1553.

19. Kawai T., Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat. Immunol., 2010, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 373-384.

20. Kraft R., Herndon D.N., Finnerty C.C., Cox R.A., Song J., Jeschke M.G. Predictive Value of IL-8 for Sepsis and Severe Infections After Burn Injury: A Clinical Study. Shock, 2015, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 222-227.

21. Kullberg R. F. J., Wiersinga W. J., Haak B. W. Gut microbiota and sepsis: from pathogenesis to novel treatments. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol., 2021, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 578-585.

22. Leligdowicz A., Matthay M.A. Heterogeneity in sepsis: new biological evidence with clinical applications. Critical Care, 2019, Vol. 23, 80.

23. Liu D., Huang S.Y., Sun J.H., et al. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: mechanisms, diagnosis and current treatment options. Mil. Med. Res., 2022, Vol. 9, No. 1, 56.

24. Llitjos J.F., Carrol E.D., Osuchowski M.F., et al. Enhancing sepsis biomarker development: key considerations from public and private perspectives. Critical Care, 2024, Vol. 28, Issue 1, 238.

25. Ma Y.J., Garred P. Pentraxins in Complement Activation and Regulation. Front. Immunol., 2018, Vol. 9, 3046.

26. Ma Y.J., Parente R., Zhong H., Sun Y., Garlanda C., Doni A. Complement-pentraxins synergy: Navigating the immune battlefield and beyond. Biomed. Pharmacother., 2023, Vol. 169, 115878.

27. Maslove D.M., Tang B., Shankar-Hari M., et al. Redefining critical illness. Nat. Med., 2022, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 1141-1148.

28. Merle N.S., Noe R., Halbwachs-Mecarelli L., Fremeaux-Bacchi V., Roumenina L.T. Complement System Part II: Role in Immunity. Front. Immunol., 2015, Vol. 6, 257.

29. Nielsen C.H., Fischer E.M., Leslie R.G. The role of complement in the acquired immune response. Immunology, 2000, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 4–12.

30. Qin Q., Liang L., Xia Y. Diagnostic and prognostic predictive values of circulating sTREM-1 in sepsis: A meta-analysis. Infect. Genet. Evol., 2021, Vol. 96, 105074.

31. Schrijver I.T., Karakike E., Théroude C., et al. High levels of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells are associated with favorable outcome in patients with pneumonia and sepsis with multi-organ failure. Intensive Care Med Exp., 2022, Vol. 10, No. 1, 5.

32. Seymour C.W., Kennedy J.N., Wang S., et al. Derivation, Validation, and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Sepsis. JAMA, 2019, Vol. 321, No. 20, pp. 2003-2017.

33. Singer M., Deutschman C.S., Seymour C.W., et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016, Vol. 315, No. 8, pp. 801-810.

34. Srzić I., Nesek A. V., Tunjić Pejak D. Sepsis definition: what's new in the treatment guidelines. Acta Clin. Croat., 2022, Vol. 61, Suppl 1, pp. 67-72.

35. Stevens J., Tezel O., Bonnefil V., Hapstack M., Atreya M.R. Biological basis of critical illness subclasses: from the bedside to the bench and back again. Crit Care, 2024, Vol. 28, No. 1, 186.

36. Torres L.K., Pickkers P., van der Poll T. Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression. Annu. Rev. Physiol., 2022, Vol. 84, pp. 157-181.

37. van der Poll T., Shankar-Hari M., Wiersinga W.J. The immunology of sepsis. Immunity, 2021, Vol. 54, No. 11, pp. 2450-2464.

38. Wang W., Liu C.F. Sepsis heterogeneity. World Journal of Pediatrics, 2023, Vol. 19, №10, pp. 919-927.

39. Wang W., Ma L., Liu B., Ouyang L. The role of trained immunity in sepsis. Front. Immunol., 2024, Vol. 15, 1449986.

40. Wei X., Tu Y., Bu S., Guo G., Wang H., Wang Z. Unraveling the Intricate Web: Complement Activation Shapes the Pathogenesis of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy. J. Innate Immun., 2024, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 337-353.

41. Wong H.R. Pediatric sepsis biomarkers for prognostic and predictive enrichment. Pediatric Research, 2022, Vol. 91, No. 2, pp. 283-288.

42. Yu W.K., McNeil J.B., Wickersham N.E., Shaver C.M., Bastarache J.A., Ware L.B. Angiopoietin-2 outperforms other endothelial biomarkers associated with severe acute kidney injury in patients with severe sepsis and respiratory failure. Crit. Care, 2021, Vol. 25, No. 1, 48.

43. Zhang T., Yu-Jing L., Ma T. Role of regulation of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in sepsis. Frontiers in Immunology, 2023, Vol. 14, 1029438.

44. Zhang X., Wang J., Guo S. Predictive value of IL-8 for mortality risk in elderly sepsis patients of emergency department. Cytokine, 2024, Vol. 184, 156774.

45. Zhang Y., Li X., Zhang X., Wang T., Zhang X. Progress in the study of pentraxin-3(PTX-3) as a biomarker for sepsis. Front Med (Lausanne), 2024, Vol. 11, 1398024.

46. Zhang Y., Maksimovic J., Huang B., et al. Cord Blood CD8+ T Cells Have a Natural Propensity to Express IL-4 in a Fatty Acid Metabolism and Caspase Activation-Dependent Manner. Front. Immunol., 2018, Vol. 9, 879.

47. Zhuo M., Fu S., Chi Y., et al. Angiopoietin-2 as a prognostic biomarker in septic adult patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Intensive Care, 2024, Vol. 14, No. 1, 169.


Supplementary files

1. 3254
Subject
Type Other
Download (547KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Potapova M.B., Zverev V.V., Babaev M.A., Bogdanova E.A., Grin O.O., Semenova I.B., Meremianina E.A., Svitich O.A. IMMUNOLOGICAL FEATURES OF SEPSIS PHENOTYPES AND ENDOTYPES. Medical Immunology (Russia). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-IFO-3254

Views: 1


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1563-0625 (Print)
ISSN 2313-741X (Online)