Preview

Medical Immunology (Russia)

Advanced search

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A METHOD FOR DETERMINING NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES TO PEMBROLIZUMAB IN HUMAN SERUM BASED ON INHIBITION OF BINDING OF PEMBROLIZUMAB TO ITS PD-1 TARGET BY ELISA

https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-DAV-3188

Abstract

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have the potential to trigger undesired humoral immune responses in the patients and the formation of ADA (anti-drug antibody) to a drug protein.

Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies are one of the main factors affecting the safety and effectiveness of the therapy. If it is impossible to use cell-based tests to determine neutralizing antibodies, competitive ligand binding assay it can be used as an alternative.

Pembrolizumab is a broad-spectrum antitumor drug and is a humanized IgG4 kappa antibody to the programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) that blocks the interaction of the receptor with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. Due to the complex analysis, the use of a cell culture test for pembrolizumab is impossible, as there is a high risk of obtaining unreliable results.

Aim. Development and validation of a method for determining neutralizing antibodies to pembrolizumab in human serum based on inhibition of binding of pembrolizumab to its PD-1 target.

Material and methods. The experimental drug pembrolizumab RPH-075 (R-Pharm) was used in the study. Anti-Pembrolizumab antibodies KRIBIOLISATM Anti-Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) ELISA, India) were used as a positive control sample for neutralizing antibodies. The determination of antibodies was carried out by the ELISA method with using acid dissociation of the immune complex and the ACE technique (Affinity capture elution).

Results. The ELISA method was validated according to the following characteristic: selectivity, sensitivity, specificity, "hook" effect, drug tolerance, precision. Due to the use of sample pretreatment approaches (acid dissociation, ACE technique) for the analysis of neutralizing antibodies, a sensitivity of 100 ng/ml was achieved in the presence of pembrolizumab 40 μg/ml.

In this paper, a method for calculating the cut-point, sensitivity, and selectivity based on ROC analysis and floating exclusion limit (PSCP) through the average values of OD NC and LPC in each individual analytical cycle was substantiated.

Conclusion. The developed method for determining neutralizing antibodies to pembrolizumab can be used to assess the undesirable immunogenicity of the pembrolizumab at the stage of clinical trials.

About the Authors

A. M. Kudryashova
Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera5a, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

researcher of laboratory of medical biotechnology



D. Yu. Grebenkin
Exakte Labs LLC, Moscow, Russia

Ph.D., chief of laboratory



M. Yu. Samsonov
R-Pharm JSC, Leninsky Prospekt, room 1, Moscow, Russia

Ph.D., Director of the Medical Department R-Pharm JSC



O. V. Filon
R-Pharm JSC, Leninsky Prospekt, room 1, Moscow, Russia

Director of the Department of Preclinical and Clinical Development



V. A. Razzhivina
R-Pharm JSC, Leninsky Prospekt, room 1, Moscow, Russia

Ph.D., Head of the Clinical Research Department



M. G. Chernobrovkin
Research Lab LLC, Russia, Moscow

Candidate of Chemical Sciences, Head of the Laboratory. Research Lab LLC



O. V. Borisova
Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera5a, Moscow, Russia

Ph.D., chief of laboratory



References

1. Решение Совета ЕЭК от 03.11.2016 № 89 «Об утверждении Правил проведения исследований биологических лекарственных средств Евразийского экономического союза».

2. Decision of the EEC Council dated 03.11.2016 No. 89 "On approval of the Rules for Conducting Research on Biological Medicinal Products of the Eurasian Economic Union". 2 Butterfield A. M., Chain J. S., Ackermann B. L., & Konrad, R. J. Comparison of assay formats for drug-tolerant immunogenicity testing. Bioanalysis, 2010, 2 no. 12, pp. 1961–1969. DOI: 10.4155/bio.10.136.

3. Chen Y. Q., Thomas G Pottanat T.G., Carter Q.L., Troutt J.S., Konrad R.J., Sloan J.H. Affinity capture elution bridging assay: a novel immunoassay format for detection of anti-therapeutic protein antibodies .Journal of Immunological Methods, 2016, vol. 431, pp. 45-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.02.008

4. Baxi S., Yang A., Gennarelli R.L., Khan N., Wang Z., Boyce L., Deborah K. Immune-related adverse events for anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 drugs: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 2018, vol.17:360:k793. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k793.

5. Bourdage J.S., Cook C.A., Farrington D.L., Chain J.S., Konrad R.J. An Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) assay for detection of anti-drug antibody to monoclonal antibody therapeutics in the presence of high levels of drug. Journal of immunological methods, 2007, vol. 327, no.1-2, pp. 10-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.07.004.

6. FDA: Guidance for Industry: Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Protein Products – Developing and Validating Assays for Anti-Drug Antibody Detection. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) January. 2019.

7. Gupta S., Indelicato S.R., Jethwa V., Kawabata T., Kelley M., Mire-Sluis A.R., Richards S. M., Rup B., Shores E., Swanson S.J., Wakshull E. Recommendations for the design, optimization, and qualification of cell-based assays used for the detection of neutralizing antibody responses elicited to biological therapeutics. Journal of immunological methods. 2007, vol. 321, no.1-2, pp. 10-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.12.004.

8. Gunn 3rd. G. R., Sealey D. C. F., Jamali F., Meibohm B., Ghosh S., Shankar G. From the bench to clinical practice: understanding the challenges and uncertainties in immunogenicity testing for biopharmaceuticals. Clin Exp Immunol, 2016, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 137-146. DOI: 10.1111/cei.12742.

9. Hu J, Wala I, Han H, Nagatani J, Barger T, Civoli F., Kaliyaperumal A., Zhuang Y., Shalini Gupta S. Comparison of cell-based and non-cell based assay platforms for the detection of clinically relevant anti-drug neutralizing antibodies for immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins. Journal of Immunological Methods, 2015, vol. 321, no. 1-2, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.12.004.

10. Khoja L., Day D., Wei-Wu Chen T., Siu L.L., Hansen AR. Tumour- and class-specific patterns of immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol, 2017, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2377–85. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx286.

11. Knezevic I., Kang H.N., Thorpe R. Immunogenicity assessment of monoclonal antibody products: a simulated case study correlating antibody induction with clinical outcomes. Biologicals, 2015, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 5307–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2015.06.009.

12. Krishna M., Nadler S. G. Immunogenicity to biotherapeutics–the role of anti-drug immune complexes. Frontiers in immunology, 2016, vol., pp.721. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00021.

13. Mora J., Palmer R., Wagner L., Wu B., Partridge M. 2023 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: ISR for ADA Assays, the Rise of dPCR vs qPCR, International Reference Standards for Vaccine Assays, Anti-AAV TAb Post-Dose Assessment, NanoString Validation, ELISpot as Gold Standard (Part 3 - Recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell Therapy, Vaccines Immunogenicity & Technologies; Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity & Risk Assessment; ADA/NAb Assay/Reporting Harmonization). Bioanalysis, 2024, vol. 16, no. 7, pp.77–119. DOI:119.10.4155/bio-2024-0024.

14. Niu H., Klem T., Yang J., Qiu Y., Pan L. A biotin-drug extraction and acid dissociation (BEAD) procedure to eliminate matrix and drug interference in a protein complex anti-drug antibody (ADA) isotype specific assay. J Immunol Methods, 2017, no. 446, pp. 30-36. DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2017.04.002.

15. Nakane P.K., Kawaoi A. J. Peroxidase-labeled antibody. A new method of conjugation. Histochem. Cytochem, 1974, vol. 22, no. 2, pp.1084-1091. DOI: 10.1177/22.12.1084.

16. Nath N., Flemming R., Godat B., Urh M. Development of NanoLuc bridging immunoassay for detection of anti-drug antibodies. J Immunol Methods, 2017, no. 450, pp. 17-26. DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2017.07.006.

17. Sasson S. C., Wilkins L. E., Watson R. A., Jolly C., Brain O., Klenerman P., Olsson-Brown A., Fairfax B. Identification of neutralising pembrolizumab anti-drug antibodies in patients with melanoma. Sci Rep, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 19253. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-98700-7.

18. Shankar G., Arkin S., Cocea L., Devanarayan V., Kirshner S., Kromminga A., Quarmby V., Richards S., Schneider C. K., Subramanyam M., Swanson S., Verthelyi D., Yim S. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Assessment and reporting of the clinical immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins and peptides-harmonized terminology and tactical recommendations. AAPS J., 2014, no. 16, pp. 658–73. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-014-9599-2.

19. Richards S. Amaravadi L., Pillutla R., Birnboeck H., Torri A., Kyra J Cowan K.J., Papadimitriou A., Garofolo F., Satterwhite C., Piccoli S., Wu B., Krinos-Fiorotti C., Allinson J., Berisha F., Cocea L., Croft S., Fraser S., Galliccia F., Gorovits B., Gupta S., Gupta V., Haidar S., Hottenstein C., Ishii-Watabe A., Jani D., Kadavil J., Kamerud J., Kramer D., Litwin V., Santos G.M.L., Nelson R., Ni Y., Pedras-Vasconcelos J., Qiu Y., Paul Rhyne P., Safavi A., Saito Y., Savoie N., Kara Scheibner K., Schick E., Siguenza P. Y., Smeraglia J., Staack R.F., Subramanyam M., Sumner G., Thway T., Uhlinger D., Ullmann M., Vitaliti M., Welink J., Whiting C.C., Xue L., Zeng R. White Paper on recent issues in bioanalysis: focus on biomarker assay validation (BAV):(Part 3–LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity). Bioanalysis, 2016, vol. 8, no. 23, pp. 2475-2496. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2016-4989.

20. Wadhwa M., Knezevic I., Kang H.N., Thorpe R. Immunogenicity assessment of biotherapeutic products: an overview of assays and their utility. Biologicals, 2015, no. 43, pp. 298–306. DOI:0.1016/j.biologicals.2015.06.004.

21. Weiner J. A. , Natarajan H., Calum J., McIntosh C., Yang E. S., Choe M., Papia C. L., Axelrod K. S., Gabriela Kovacikova G., Pegu A., Ackerman M.E. Selection of positive controls and their impact on anti-drug antibody assay performance. J Immunol Methods, 2024, no. 528, pp. 113657. DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2024.113657.

22. Wu B, Chung S, Jiang X-R., McNally J., Pedras-Vasconcelos J., Pillutla R, White J. T., Xu Y., Gupta S. Strategies to determine assay. format for the assessment of neutralizing antibody responses to biotherapeutics. The AAPS journal, 2016, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1335-50. DOI:10.1208/s12248-016-9954-6.

23. Wu B.W., Gunn III G.R. Shankar G. Competitive Ligand-Binding Assays for the Detection of Neutralizing Antibodies. Detection and quantification of antibodies to biopharmaceuticals: practical and applied considerations. Detection and Quantification of Antibodies to Biopharmaceuticals, 2011, pp. 175-192. DOI:10.1002/9781118075685.ch10.

24. Wu B., Schnarr M., Devlin J. L., Brown S., Yang T-Y. Approaches to improve drug tolerance and target tolerance in the assessment of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies. Bioanalysis, 2019, vol. 11, no. 22, pp. 2061-2074. DOI:10.4155/bio-2019-0184.

25. Xiang Y., Parng C., Olson K., Seletskaia E., Gorovits B., Jani D., Caiazzo T. , Joyce A. , Donley J. Neutralizing antibody assaydevelopment with high drug and target tolerance to support clinical development of an anti-TFPI therapeutic monoclonal antibody. The AAPS Journal, 2019, vol. 21 no. 3, pp. 1-10. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0320-3.

26. Zoghbi J., Xu Y., Grabert R., Theobald V., Richards S. A breakthrough novel method to resolve the drug and target interference problem in immunogenicity assays. J Immunol Methods, 2015, no.426, pp. 62-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.08.002.


Supplementary files

1. 3188
Subject
Type Other
Download (618KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Kudryashova A.M., Grebenkin D.Yu., Samsonov M.Yu., Filon O.V., Razzhivina V.A., Chernobrovkin M.G., Borisova O.V. DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A METHOD FOR DETERMINING NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES TO PEMBROLIZUMAB IN HUMAN SERUM BASED ON INHIBITION OF BINDING OF PEMBROLIZUMAB TO ITS PD-1 TARGET BY ELISA. Medical Immunology (Russia). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-DAV-3188

Views: 15


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1563-0625 (Print)
ISSN 2313-741X (Online)